The Invisible Stitch of Global Health
AI-Driven Epidemic Intelligence as a Global Public Good
By Víctor Piriz Correa, MD, MPH, CEO – Seniors International Consulting (SICs)
The COVID-19 pandemic exposed an uncomfortable paradox. The world had unprecedented volumes of data, increasingly sophisticated epidemiological models, and rapidly evolving artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities. Yet many countries responded with fragmented information systems, siloed departments, and weak linkages between surveillance, clinical services, and political decision-making. The result was not merely technical inefficiency, but a response that proved uneven, delayed, and extraordinarily costly in human, social, and economic terms. In this context, epidemic intelligence (EI) has emerged not simply as a technical specialty but as a core function of modern health systems and global health security. AI, far from being an end in itself, can become the thread that stitches together data, institutions, and decisions. As in haute couture, the durability of the fabric does not depend on each individual piece of cloth, but on the quality of the invisible stitch that binds them. Today, AI-enabled epidemic intelligence must be understood as a global public good. When it fails, the consequences do not respect borders. This reframes the role of states, multilateral development banks, and major funders when investing in health systems and digital transformation.
From Technical Craft to Global Public Good
Epidemic intelligence can be defined as the organized cycle of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting information from all available sources to detect, verify, and assess public health threats. It encompasses:
Case-, syndrome-, and event-based surveillance
Early signal detection and verification
Risk assessment and decision support under the International Health Regulations
Information management and dissemination through alerts, bulletins, and event management systems
Across the Americas, the Pan American Health Organization and its Member States process millions of reports and hundreds of signals each year, many of which evolve into substantiated events requiring coordinated action.
During COVID-19, this architecture was severely strained by:
Segmented national information systems operating in silos
Non-interoperable data flows, with duplication and delays
Weak governance frameworks for data and AI
The post-pandemic lesson is unequivocal: without strong stitches between these components, the institutional fabric tears precisely when it is needed most.
Where AI Adds Value in Public Health
The essential public health functions offer a clear map of where AI can strengthen systemic performance. Rather than replacing these functions, AI enhances them—when embedded within a coherent institutional architecture.
1. Situation Analysis, Surveillance, and Planning
AI supports:
Continuous population health monitoring through updated surveillance systems
Detection of subtle patterns in incidence, severity, and mortality using machine learning and deep learning
Integration of clinical data, search trends, social media, and news sources to increase surveillance sensitivity
Scenario modelling for transmission dynamics and resource allocation
Geospatial mapping of disease spread based on mobility and network models
Platforms such as ProMED, HealthMap, BlueDot, and EPIWATCH demonstrate how open-source intelligence and digital data streams can complement traditional surveillance.
2. Promotion, Prevention, and Risk Communication
AI also strengthens health promotion and community engagement:
Accelerating vaccine and therapeutic development through computational modelling
Monitoring narratives, sentiment, and misinformation via natural language processing
Supporting culturally adapted communication strategies and real-time campaign evaluation
Enabling more inclusive and rights-based public engagement
In an era where information spreads faster than pathogens, narrative intelligence is inseparable from epidemic intelligence.
3. Governance, Regulation, and System Quality
In governance domains, AI can assist with:
Harmonizing quality standards across integrated health systems
Supporting regulatory frameworks for medical technologies
Detecting anomalies in financial management and service delivery
Simulating policy scenarios before implementation
Technical interoperability is foundational. Standards such as HL7 FHIR (Health Level Seven International Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) and frameworks like SMART on FHIR enable AI models to integrate safely into electronic health records and surveillance platforms.
4. Human Resources and Capacity Building
AI-based training platforms allow personalized learning in epidemiology, surveillance, ethics, and data governance. Human capacity remains the decisive factor; AI amplifies expertise but does not substitute institutional judgment.
Taken together, AI is not a standalone module. It is a transversal layer that can reinforce nearly all public health functions when embedded in a systemic vision.
From Theory to Operation: AI in Epidemic Intelligence
Operationally, AI contributes through several families of tools:
Knowledge-based systems that encode expert rules for decision support.
Natural language processing (NLP) to classify and summarize multilingual reports, social media, and clinical documentation.
Machine learning models that detect anomalous consultation patterns and forecast short- and medium-term trends.
Deep learning architectures for medical imaging, complex text classification, and advanced forecasting.
Automatic speech recognition, transforming audio into structured data to sustain governance continuity during crises.
Accumulated experience suggests that multimodal and multi-source approaches—combining traditional epidemiology with AI—are consistently more robust than any single technique.
A Global Public Good in Practice
A concrete example of this integration is the upgrade of the Epidemic Intelligence fronew data streams such as automatically transcribed radio broadcasts, and strengthens multilingual collaboration across Member States. EIOS is offered as a free global public good, accompanied by guidance, training, and communities of practice. It illustrates how AI can function as the invisible stitch connecting heterogeneous data streams and institutional actors into a cooperative global security architecture.
Post-COVID Lessons: Fragmentation and Noisy Data
The pandemic revealed a structural mismatch: high-performancs sources. Integrating search data, mobility information, and social media signals into existing legal and ethical frameworks proved complex. In tailoring terms, it was like sewing high-tech thread onto worn fabric with irregular seams. AI demonstrated promise—but also exposed the limits of fragmented systems and the urgency of rethinking data and algorithmic governance.
Governance of AI
Post-pandemic proliferation of AI tools—triage chatbots, forecasting dashboards, automated alerts—risks generating digital fragmentation if not properly governed.
Without clear governance:
Tools remain disconnected from national surveillance systems
They fail to align with existing public health mandates
They risk amplifying bias and inequities
AI governance in health requires:
Explicit principles of equity, transparency, explainability, and rights protection
Defined accountability structures
Technical interoperability grounded in internationally recognized standards
Explicit integration into public health functions, regulation, and social participation mechanisms
Only then can AI become the “magic knot” that holds together the layers of the system rather than adding new fractures. For development agencies, multilateral banks, and major funders, AI-enabled epidemic intelligence represents:
A macroeconomic resilience asset: early containment prevents systemic GDP losses
A transversal infrastructure strengthening surveillance, regulation, clinical care, research, and communication
A platform for aligning health, digital transformation, climate adaptation, and social cohesion agendas
Investment should therefore prioritize:
Interoperable national and regional epidemic intelligence architectures
Robust AI and data governance frameworks
Human and institutional capacity development
Preservation of epidemic intelligence as a transparent global public good.
Conclusion
COVID-19 was a stress test for digital health governance and epidemic intelligence. It showed that the challenge was not merely insufficient data or modelling capacity, but the inability to coherently stitch together public health functions, governance levels, and international actors. Responsibly governed AI can serve as the invisible thread that strengthens surveillance, planning, communication, and regulation; transforms noisy data into actionable intelligence; and connects health, development, and economic stability agendas. But this requires moving from fragmented, reactive systems to integrated, proactive architectures grounded in rights, transparency, and trust. Conceived as a global public good, epidemic intelligence stands as one of the most strategic pillars for health security and societal resilience in the twenty-first century.
References
World Health Organization. WHO upgrades its public health intelligence system to boost global health security. 2025.
Abat C. Traditional and syndromic surveillance of infectious diseases. Int J Infect Dis.
Brownstein JS et al. Advances in artificial intelligence for infectious-disease surveillance. N Engl J Med.
Morley J et al. The ethics of AI in health care. Soc Sci Med.
Li J et al. Enhancing epidemic forecasting accuracy by combining real-time and historical data. JMIR Public Health Surveill.
Santillana M et al. Combining search, social media, and traditional data sources to improve influenza surveillance. PLoS Comput Biol.